sweet communist African treeplanting
James Baguma and Appiah Sai-Boateng ("Boat") were commie planters from Africa.
"Commie planting" is tree-planter parlance for working with someone and then at the end of the day - regardless of who planted how many trees - splitting the total tally evenly. Successful commie-planting partnerships are rare (and rarely last very long) because treeplanting is backbreaking piecework, and we as humans are hard-wired to be money-grubbing, greedy little capitalists.
That, at least, is the narrative I've always been fed. "Sure," they say, "capitalism is promulgated and sustained by human greed... but what's the alternative? If we don't have a reward system directly tied to effort and motivated by the basic, fear-tied emotional undercurrent of greed, then how do you expect to ever get anything done?"
The argument is compelling, and seems to have "worked." The Protestant work ethic, tied to the Capitalist Machine, has made a lot of people very, very wealthy. But at what price? What does it profit a country to gain power over the whole world if, in the process, it loses the essence of what it means to be human? What of love? What of grace? Must we ignore what many economists have pointed out - that the greed-motivator does not level the playing field, and that the greatest rewards often just end up going to the greediest? Is this good - this world we have - when a small percentage of us get to roll around, living off the fat of everybody else's land? Is this really the only way we, as humans, are capable of being?
I don't know.
Hope tells me to doubt it. Hope tells me - as I said in my post about the Fear of Sex - to avoid any shortcuts intended to manage bad behavior without healing the wounds that lie at their source; and instead to believe that we are capable of more. Hope tells me to trust in the slow work of Love, and to believe that the arc of the Moral Universe is indeed long, but it does bend towards justice.
Boat and Baguma were not perfect tree-planters. They could be whiny, selfish, greedy punks, just like everybody else. But they still commie planted all season long. It didn't matter if they were on the same crew, the same cut-block... or even if one of them was too sick to do much of anything. They always-always-always split their tallies right down the middle. And together, they highballed... which is to say that one summer, working together, they commie-planted their way to the position of Top Planter in our eight-hundred-planter company; earning (as I recall) over twenty-one thousand dollars each.
Why did this work?
I think it worked because they loved each other. Because they were friends. Because they believed that together, they could be much stronger than they were alone.
I hear a lot of Righties out there using the word "socialism" as a sort of evil catch-phrase, a way of (they believe) vilifying their opponents and ending all discussion. I think that a lot of times, they're wrong. I think we've grown rich in money and poor in spirit by accepting without question the Capitalist System as it has been handed down to us - by appealing first to human greed.
I think it's time we try something else.
No, I don't think people with power ought to be using it to force people with excess money to be good and kind and loving with it.* Rather, I think people with power ought to hand that power over to people with money, and hope that they'll rise to the occasion.
But we don't live in a world where "ought" ever really gets a chance to become reality; and when the people with the power are the people with money, a country that is ostensibly a democracy ought to rise up and design a system where love and hope - not greed and power - are the forces that define economic justice.
A pipe dream? Possibly... probably.
You could no doubt show me a dozen reasons why it would never work. I'm not talking about pragmatism, though. I'm talking about hope. I'm asking you to imagine a different, better world. Perhaps we've spent too long trusting in the benevolence of fat, entitled white guys. Perhaps it's time to start asking the Africans how to run the show.
- - -
(I mean, it's not like it's a matter of life and death, right? It's not like anybody's dying because of the uneven distribution of wealth, right? Right?!? RIGHT?!?)
"Commie planting" is tree-planter parlance for working with someone and then at the end of the day - regardless of who planted how many trees - splitting the total tally evenly. Successful commie-planting partnerships are rare (and rarely last very long) because treeplanting is backbreaking piecework, and we as humans are hard-wired to be money-grubbing, greedy little capitalists.
That, at least, is the narrative I've always been fed. "Sure," they say, "capitalism is promulgated and sustained by human greed... but what's the alternative? If we don't have a reward system directly tied to effort and motivated by the basic, fear-tied emotional undercurrent of greed, then how do you expect to ever get anything done?"
The argument is compelling, and seems to have "worked." The Protestant work ethic, tied to the Capitalist Machine, has made a lot of people very, very wealthy. But at what price? What does it profit a country to gain power over the whole world if, in the process, it loses the essence of what it means to be human? What of love? What of grace? Must we ignore what many economists have pointed out - that the greed-motivator does not level the playing field, and that the greatest rewards often just end up going to the greediest? Is this good - this world we have - when a small percentage of us get to roll around, living off the fat of everybody else's land? Is this really the only way we, as humans, are capable of being?
I don't know.
Hope tells me to doubt it. Hope tells me - as I said in my post about the Fear of Sex - to avoid any shortcuts intended to manage bad behavior without healing the wounds that lie at their source; and instead to believe that we are capable of more. Hope tells me to trust in the slow work of Love, and to believe that the arc of the Moral Universe is indeed long, but it does bend towards justice.
Why did this work?
I think it worked because they loved each other. Because they were friends. Because they believed that together, they could be much stronger than they were alone.
I hear a lot of Righties out there using the word "socialism" as a sort of evil catch-phrase, a way of (they believe) vilifying their opponents and ending all discussion. I think that a lot of times, they're wrong. I think we've grown rich in money and poor in spirit by accepting without question the Capitalist System as it has been handed down to us - by appealing first to human greed.
I think it's time we try something else.
No, I don't think people with power ought to be using it to force people with excess money to be good and kind and loving with it.* Rather, I think people with power ought to hand that power over to people with money, and hope that they'll rise to the occasion.
But we don't live in a world where "ought" ever really gets a chance to become reality; and when the people with the power are the people with money, a country that is ostensibly a democracy ought to rise up and design a system where love and hope - not greed and power - are the forces that define economic justice.
A pipe dream? Possibly... probably.
You could no doubt show me a dozen reasons why it would never work. I'm not talking about pragmatism, though. I'm talking about hope. I'm asking you to imagine a different, better world. Perhaps we've spent too long trusting in the benevolence of fat, entitled white guys. Perhaps it's time to start asking the Africans how to run the show.
- - -
(I mean, it's not like it's a matter of life and death, right? It's not like anybody's dying because of the uneven distribution of wealth, right? Right?!? RIGHT?!?)
Right on and amen.
ReplyDeleteThanks, your Nina-ness! You have earned one Bark-Buck. Redeemable nowhere.
ReplyDeleteJames planted in our camp at Windfirm for the last couple of years. He still plants a lot of trees, especially for his age. He also is very interesting to talk to; always willing to give advice about money, relationships, and religion.
ReplyDelete@DanielB...how's his quality? :)
ReplyDelete